A Guide to Critical reading

Critical Reading: A Guide is a useful site to help you revise for Unfamiliar Texts. The site is a guide to what you might look for in analysing literature, particularly poetry and fiction. You may find the introduction difficult but persevere and have a look at the section on the critical analysis of poetry.

Unfamiliar Texts Tips

I know some of you are starting to get a bit twitchy about the fast approaching exams and need a little bit of reassurance. In this post I will go over the basics of Achievement Standard 90724 (Unfamiliar Texts).

You will answer questions based on two written texts ‑ one prose and one poetry. Questions will be set on each text and there will also be questions involving the comparison of both texts.

You will be given a resource booklet with all texts to be read and a separate question and an answer booklet with lines for you to write on.

I suggest that you spend at least 40 minutes on completing this standard. You could spend 20 minutes reading and answering each text.

As you know questions in this standard no longer have separate parts. The questions are specific enough to apply to the text, but wide enough to enable all students to attempt a response while better students can reach for Excellence. You are not required to write essay responses in this standard. You do need to have a “toolbox” of well-understood language terms. This applies to the specifics of language, grammar, style etc, as well as to understanding the wording of the questions. Terms such as “identify”, “discuss”, “compare” also need to be understood.

Key skills you need to achieve in this standard are:

  • ability to read and understand the texts
  • ability to identify/label language techniques/features of style
  • ability to link language techniques/features of style to effect
  • ability to support the above with appropriate references to and/or quotations from the text
  • ability to make connections within a text on a literal level
  • ability to identify and discuss pivotal points or shifts in tone.

To achieve well in this standard you must be able to:

  • write in-depth answers, and provide examples which are then analysed and explained
  • identify clearly elements of style/language techniques and explain their effect
  • write in an integrated style, providing an holistic understanding of the text (perhaps using embedded quotes) rather than discussing techniques/meanings in isolation
  • show an awareness of connections between ideas in the text, commenting on patterns, contrasts etc
  • show an awareness of author’s purpose
  • show an awareness of how language works
  • analyse rather than describe
  • identify and discuss clearly elements of style and explain their effect
  • identify and discuss clearly changes in tone and explain the effect
  • make perceptive links between language features/style and the author’s purpose
  • show an understanding of comparing/contrasting
  • read confidently for inference, commenting confidently on connotative as well as denotative meanings
  • have a fluent writing style
  • respond in a personal way and show evidence of intelligent, original thought
  • discuss reader response
  • evaluate texts effectively.

So no problems there … https://i0.wp.com/planetsmilies.net/shocked-smiley-9456.gif

Appreciating the writer’s craft in Unfamiliar Texts

051026_gw_cartoon_tn

If you want to revise Unfamiliar Texts go to BBC Bitesize. Try the section ‘Appreciating the writer’s craft’. I have added an extract below which discusses why writers do not always follow the ‘rules’.

* Writers deliberately leave out things like subjects and verbs for effect. This sometimes helps to focus ideas on the ‘action’ of a sentence if it is the subject which is omitted: the words around such ‘sentences’ – the context – will have already informed the reader who or what the subject is.

* Writers deliberately repeat expressions for effect (e.g. At first, they were happy. At first, they were completely satisfied. At first, everything was perfect. That was at first).

* Writers deliberately repeat words like conjunctions (‘and’ and ‘but’), to suggest a build-up of ideas, or to indicate the number of things which happen at the one time. This means a sentence becomes unusually long.

* Writers deliberately use a technique known as a rhetorical question, where they ask a question not to find an answer, but to provoke thought in the reader; or because it is way of them indicating to the reader that they themselves might be uncertain of something. This shows that they are trying to work out something themselves.

* Writers deliberately open sentences with conjunctions like ‘but’, to emphasise strongly a change of direction in an argument or indicate a distinct point of opposition in a line of thought.

* Writers deliberately use list forms in sentences, whether it be individual words or expressions or phrases, again to indicate a build-up of information, or to stress a particular line of argument.

* There are other possibilities, but hopefully these will give you food for thought for the moment!

Why sentence structure matters

Try this link to find a very good website on sentence structure. This site will be useful in revising for Unfamiliar Texts.

Remember a good writer uses different types of sentences in different situations:

* a long complex sentence will show what information depends on what other information;

* a compound sentence will emphasise balance and parallelism;

* a short simple sentence will grab a reader’s attention;

* a loose sentence will tell the reader in advance how to interpret your information;

* a periodic sentence will leave the reader in suspense until the very end;

* a declarative sentence will avoid any special emotional impact;

* an exclamatory sentence, used sparingly, will jolt the reader;

* an interrogative sentence will force the reader to think about what you are writing; and

* an imperative sentence will make it clear that you want the reader to act right away.

Last minute tips for Unfamiliar Texts

In this post I will remind you about how to approach a piece of unfamiliar text and how to avoid common errors.

  • Take note of the the title – you will often find clues to the meaning of the passage there. It might even help you to work out the mood or angle of the piece.
  • Follow instructions – if you are told to write an answer in your own words that is exactly what you should do!
  • Support your answers with evidence from the text. Make sure to add relevant quotes – don’t copy out half the passage.
  • Identify and quote, identify and quote, identify and quote … I hope I am getting my point across! If they ask for that make sure you do BOTH!
  • Explain your answer, be specific. Answers like “it makes it sound good” as a discussion of why a sound device was used will not cut it!
  • Use examples! No really … USE EXAMPLES!
  • Point of view means whether it is first, second or third person narration.
  • Syntax is about sentence structure. For a more detailed discussion go here.
  • Tense is about verbs, it is not about your mood. Check it out here.
  • Know your terms and read questions carefully. Know what you are being asked.
  • The most important thing to do is to answer the question, in detail with supporting evidence.

Analysing an Unfamiliar Text

In order to analyse, interpret and evaluate a text you need to be familiar with the language features and conventions of a range of contrasting texts from a range of genres. You need to be familiar with the structure and function of words, their ordering in sentences; word and sentence choices and the effect of these choices on ideas, meaning and style.

When faced with an unfamiliar text, you need to understand the language, meanings and ideas and the literary qualities and effects of the text, and be able to respond to all of these, considering purpose and audience.

As you read the texts in the exam, underline words and phrases which seem to be significant in terms of language, ideas and meanings, or style (literary qualities and effects) or purpose and audience. Annotate the text, jotting ideas over the extract.

Free Verse and other terms

http://www.poetryarchive.org/poetryarchive/glossaryItem.do?letter=F&id=8091

Check out the Glossary of Poetic Terms at the Poetry Archive to help you revise for Unfamiliar Texts. Look here for answers to your questions on the language we use to talk about poetry.

Like art, sport, business, music, and every other complex human activity, poetry has developed its own specialist vocabulary. It can be daunting to come across, for the first time, someone talking about a “bear market”, a “pas de deux”, or the “offside rule”… but these terms are useful tools, and worth acquiring so that you can talk and write about your subject with confidence.

You can use this glossary to check how to pronounce a word or phrase, find out what it means and learn how to use it in a sentence. You can explore some of the ways in which poets use language, the choices they make and the effects those choices create. There are examples to read and listen to, in poems specially chosen from the Poetry Archive.

Connotation and denotation

Connotation is the emotional and imaginative association surrounding a word.

Denotation is the strict dictionary meaning of a word.

Here’s an example:

“You may live in a house, but we live in a home.”

If you were to look up the words house and home in a dictionary, you would find that both words have approximately the same meaning- “a dwelling place.” However, the speaker in the sentence above suggests that home has an additional meaning. Aside from the strict dictionary definition, or denotation, many people associate such things as comfort, love, security, or privacy with a home but do not necessarily make the same associations with a house. What is the first thing that comes to your mind when you think of a home? of a house? Why do you think that real-estate advertisements use the word home more frequently than house? The various feelings, images, and memories that surround a word make up its connotation. Although both house and home have the same denotation, or dictionary meaning, home also has many connotations.

Connotation and denotation exercise.

See how denotation and connotation function in The Fish.

How to achieve in AS 90724

Achievement Standard 90724 is Read and Respond Critically to Unfamiliar Prose and Poetry Texts and in this post I will give you some pointers for achieving it and achieving it at merit and excellence level. Here are the essentials:

  1. You do need a good knowledge of language techniques
  2. Analytical skills are essential and you must be able to understand the texts and the questions. You need to be familiar with question analysis and text analysis. Show evidence of thought processing. Remember you can highlight and annotate the texts and questions in the resource booklet.
  3. The assessment report noted that the students who achieved this standard demonstrated the following skills and knowledge:
  • ability to identify techniques and to select accurate examples of these
  • understanding of basic/literal ideas, but not always metaphorical meanings
  • ability to respond to the wording of each part of the question
  • ability to attempt to explain the effects of language/literacy techniques within the context of a specific passage
  • ability to support ideas by referring to appropriate details in the texts
  • ability to make connections within a text on a literal level
  • ability to express ideas clearly
  • Students who achieved with merit or excellence tended to:

  • write comprehensive in-depth answers covering a range of points
  • make connections across the text, commenting on patterns, contrasts etc
  • respond to ideas and language on oth literal and metaphorical levels
  • read confidently for inference and commented on connotative and denotative meanings
  • focused on how identified techniques were used to achieve the writer’s purpose (e.g. showing that you understood the use of satire in the poem)
  • provided perceptive analyses indicating wider prior/general knowledge that they could apply appropriately
  • related specific techniques to the overall text – provided a holistic sense of the text rather than discussing techniques/meanings in narrow isolation
  • could demonstrate how techniques can work together for the same effect
  • expanded answers to tease out the implications of the points made
  • “unpacked” key words from the texts and the questions
  • gave detailed evidence to support ideas (please note!)
  • chose examples that gave greater scope for appropriate analysis
  • responded in a personal way and showed evidence of intelligent, original thought
  • could identify tone and describe how the tone was created. The student was aware of shifts of tone within the text.
  • was able to accurately identify and explain a range of techniques (not just simile and metaphor!) but allusion, antithesis …
  • used sophisticated, varied language that allows a greater degree of precision on analysis
  • has a fluent writing style and a flair for language.