Love, reality and science

Does science have the answers to everything about ‘‘reality’’?

 

Science cannot really account for Jed Parry, despite the ‘‘diagnostic criteria’’ of de Clerambault, outlined in the first appendix in Ian McEwan’s novel Enduring Love.

 

The final appendix (the last word?) belongs to Parry and his ironically ‘‘enduring love’’, which has been frantically ‘‘endured’’ by Joe Rose, whose own behaviour has been ambivalently ‘‘endured’’ by his partner Clarissa.

 

Definitions, behaviours and meanings around ‘‘love’’ and ‘‘reality’’ are integral to the novel’s themes, but also the meaning of science.

 

Science and reason are among the defining features of Western culture, and this 1997 novel mounts an intriguing case to explore their limits — and limitations.

 

McEwan’s lively and intense characters — especially Joe and Jed — embody polar-opposite positions on the spectrum of reason and emotion, rationality and faith, science and art in this dramatic questioning: whose reality?

Read more here.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s